Write the brief down or argue about it later
Every disagreement on a session day is a disagreement that could have happened cheaply a week earlier.
The brief is the least glamorous document in the process and the one that determines whether the day goes well.
What belongs in it
What the record is supposed to sound like, in references rather than adjectives. Who decides — one name, not a committee. What is already agreed and cannot be reopened. What the deliverables are and when they are due.
References do more work than any description. Warmer means six different things. This record, this sound, at this point in it, means one.
An argument on the day costs the day. The same argument a week earlier costs an email.
The decision-maker question
Of everything on that list, the one that saves the most money is naming who decides. Not who is consulted — who decides.
A session with an artist, a manager, a label contact and two friends on the sofa has five opinions and no mechanism for resolving them. The engineer ends up arbitrating between people who outrank them, which is an unwinnable position, and the day dissolves into consensus-seeking.
Ask the question directly and early, in writing, in a tone that makes it sound administrative rather than confrontational: if there is a disagreement on the day, whose call is it? Everybody already knows the answer. Writing it down just means nobody has to discover it at four in the afternoon.
Using references properly
A reference is not an instruction to copy. It is a shared vocabulary, and it works because it removes the translation step between one person's adjective and another's.
- Ask for three to five, not twenty. More than five means nobody has decided.
- Ask for a specific moment in each — the timestamp and what about it. The drum sound at one minute ten is usable. This whole album is not.
- Ask for one anti-reference. What it must not sound like is often clearer in the client's head than what it should, and it narrows the field faster.
- Listen to all of them before the session, on your system, and note what they actually have in common. It is frequently not the thing the client named.
That last point is where the real value is. Clients pick references by feel and then explain them wrongly. Three references chosen for their vocal sound often turn out to share an arrangement density instead, and knowing that before the day starts changes what you do.
Writing down what is closed
The most useful line in a brief is often the list of things that are already agreed and not being reopened. The arrangement is locked. The vocal take is chosen. The tempo is the tempo.
Without that, every session carries an invisible possibility that anything could be revisited, and on a slow afternoon someone will revisit something. With it, the conversation has a floor, and if a closed item genuinely needs reopening it becomes a deliberate decision with a visible cost rather than a drift.
Keeping it short
One page. References, decision-maker, what is closed, deliverables, dates, budget. Anything longer will not be read, and a brief nobody reads is worse than none because it creates a false record of agreement.
Send it after the first conversation, as a summary rather than a contract: here is what I understood, correct anything wrong. People correct summaries readily and negotiate documents reluctantly. Same content, entirely different response.
Write it as a summary of what you heard, not a demand for what you need. Nobody argues with a summary.
Keep reading
Comping is an editorial job, not a technical one
The best comp is rarely the one made of the best individual moments.
Read →The headphone mix is a performance tool
It is worth more to the take than any decision you will make about tone, and it is the thing most often rushed.
Read →The last mile is where records get lost
Everything is finished, approved, and about to be undone by a file name.
Read →All notes
Every note, newest first.
Back to Notes →